How to set your own raise, fairly and ethically

April 29, 2011

Dear Bob ...

A few years back during the annual salary review process, I was given a fixed sum to allocate to my team of developers, administrators, and IT support staff. I was diligent and thorough in the allocation, ensuring that each team member received his or her due within the budgetary constraints.

[ Want to cash in on your IT experiences? InfoWorld is looking for stories of an amazing or amusing IT adventure, lesson learned, or tales from the trenches. Send your story to offtherecord@infoworld.com. If we publish it, we'll keep you anonymous and send you a $50 American Express gift cheque. ]

When I presented the distribution proposal to my new boss, his only criticism was directed at my failure to set aside money from for my own pay adjustment. Furthermore, he criticized me for allowing some team members' pay to exceed my own. He then directed me to revise the distribution.

My gut reaction was that determining my own pay adjustment was not ethical. I also suspected that the boss was attempting to lay a trap with his directive. (To keep the story short, I'll not go into the list of his disruptive acts that gave birth to schemes, intrigue, and conflict in the office. Let's just say that he established a pattern of behavior that fostered paranoia.) Thus, I resubmitted my original distribution proposal and went without a pay adjustment.

While he and the company are in my past, I find myself reflecting on that event occasionally. Did I do the right thing? Or should I have handled it differently?

- Raising the Roof

---

Dear Raising ...

I was hoping you'd ask me the easy question: Did your manager handle this properly? That's a slam dunk. The answer: Of course not. Nobody should be responsible for either budgeting or setting their own salary increases. That only makes sense under the theory that we each are the best judges of our own performance and are entirely immune to conflicts of interest. I suppose a case could be made for these theories, but only if minor factors like evidence and logic aren't part of the discussion.

Usually I can at least figure out a plausible hypothesis of how a manager might rationalize his/her behavior. This time I can't even come close; the best case is that your manager was either too lazy or too cowardly to give you an honest assessment of your performance and preferred not to do his job in deciding on your compensation change and explaining it to you. My other hypotheses are even worse.

Source: http://www.infoworld.com/t/it-management/how-set-your-own-raise-fairly-and-ethically-369?source=rss_infoworld_blogs

kentucky derby mavericks teacher appreciation week mothers day gift lvs